The mill in the rural Swedish town of Fengersfors is for sale and – as an artist cooperative active at the mill for 15 years – Not Quite see this as a chance to mobilize our community and co-create a sustainable future.
LocationNot Quite, Fabriksvägen, Fengersfors, Sweden
Fengersfors town is firmly rural (for being a town), 20 minutes drive from the town of Åmål, and 2:30 to the city of Gothenburg.
The average income is SEK 208.000 per year, which equals 76% of the national mean, so for Swedish standards it is relatively poor.
Homogeneity is hard to measure, but the overwhelming majority of villagers are born in Sweden and has Swedish as their mother tongue
The town has a school, kindergarten, grocery store, bakery, town hall, cultural
association, sports club, several B&B, beach and Not Quite cultural center.
The town has 538 registered inhabitants, the cultural center has 67 co-owners. It is a small place.
28% of inhabitants are aged 16-44 years and an equal amount are 45-64 years, 24% are over 65. So relatively old.
Most people in town know, or know about each other, but maybe artists and townspeople can get to know each other better and work towards an even more common future.
How the audience/participants were reached or discovered
The target group of the project are co-owners of Not Quite, and townspeople of Fengersfors and surrounding areas.
In the town we have so far worked with the Community Council (byalaget) and the project group for project Sustainable Places (Hållbara platser) and reached out through their channels and meetings.
Not Quite has a pretty tight community, Facebook groups, email-list etc. And meet each other fairly regularly.
How it was done
For this work we used lectures mostly as a way to get everybody on the same page, and describe basic concepts.
We have done very few “knowledge lectures” – instead tried to harvest as must knowledge and ideas as ever possible from the participants and community.
We have organized several workshops as part of the initiative.
Generally we have worked with a workshop structure concept called the “Double diamond” and largely facilitated by Fantastic Studios
1 – We started with an overall focus question – in this case relating to the future of the factory – and generated very many, crazy, fun, and very serious, ideas to address it – using positive feedback and encouragement (“discover” below).
2 – Then we went into a more analytical and selective phase ending up with a number of suggested ideas to move forward (“define below”).
3 – In the next phase, we generated ideas for how to concretely realize the selected ideas (“develop” below)
4 – Lastly, we selected and outlined details for how the selected solutions to realize ideas could be done. Ending up with a number of fairly detailed trajectories presented to the group (“deliver” below).
We usually worked in small groups, and presented for the big group, so that everybody got to speak and express their mind and ideas.
We used mapping for several stages of the work – to strengthen the visual understanding of concepts, and to paint a “landscape” of what is was that we discussed.
Archiving was not a big part of the job, but very important, and we found it interesting and fundamental to dive into the history of the mill, and tell the story in a new way, focusing on the changes that has continuously reshaped the town throughout its 222 years of existence. Tying history and heritage with the future was also very important to attract the town population that are not necessarily interested in the culture center as such. Read about the history on pp 8 in the report below.
On top of archiving into the history of the mill and the town in Fengersfors, we also continuously need to reevaluate our methods and relevance. Travel and networking is a central part of this and something the Not Quite community engages on a lot. For this particular work we visited, among others, the Pioneer Works Culture center in Red Hook, New York. We found a center (for all its differences between Fengersfors and downtown New York City) with vast similarities to Not Quite, seeking to shape and combine innovative culture and research within an industrial cultural heritage setting. In their case a iron work from the 1860s. A short write-up was included in the report.
Interviews was an important part of the work – but the method will be more systematically applied in the next stage of the project. By making in-depth interviews with townspeople, also the ones usually not interested in the work at the art center, we wish to both create a better understanding for the possibilities and worries in the town – and anchor our work more deeply within the community.
Writing & Photography
We felt the need to frame and tell a different kind of story about Fengersfors, and the concept of the “mill town” in general. In the current economical landscape the mill town is steeped in prejudices and misconceptions, and we see something very different in the town where we live and work. Writing the The New Mill Town report (and trying to include great imagery and graphs) was a process long in the waiting. A start of a new way of telling our story.
The main concrete result of the work so far is the report The New Mill Town (Den nya bruksorten) that summarizes the work, perspectives, ideas, and possibilities going forward.
We outlined four concrete challenges, and ideas to address them, that is and will guide our work going forward:
1. The Place, as in the physical location and community around the mill
2. Creativity, as in the power of arts and culture for its own sake – and for society
3. Sustainability, as in developing today without destroying the future. Three aspects (that build on each other)
– Ecological sustainability
– Societal sustainability
– Financial sustainability
4. Learning & Networks, as in constant contact with, and mutual change together with the world outside
The report is available in full text
in English here
in Swedish here
Overview of the final report above
We are now part of several processes for the future and will update this Activity report as these move forward. Also see the timeline below for updates on process.
How it went
Main lessons learned
The process has helped us stay on top of our own future, and be able to define our own dreams and goals in a structured process.
It may be too early to make any lasting analysis of what we really learned from this process, it is still going on, and we are
very much in the middle of it. However, some general remarks so far:
- Its the small things that counts, the smiles, the energy we bring with us into a session, the idea of making it possible – together
- It is also the big things that counts. Like constantly talking to all the main players (in this case, current owner, and main public and private stakeholders). Because the big picture must hold for the community work to be able to have an impact. There is no smooth sailing without a good wind.
- Visual is the king/queen of communication. Images really helps to transfer complex ideas into concrete discussions
- The power of inclusive design for making people feel part of the solutions
- Looking outside of our comfort zone also in terms of inspirations and concepts
- Pay attention to serendipity, and don’t move faster than you can also stop and take along new ideas and perspectives
A concrete example of a rather serendipitous discovery was the making of the “New Mill Town” definition and concept. It was the result of a serendipitous process that could not have been foreseen (we compared notes and research thoughts one evening, and suddenly thinking paths and references crossed into what quickly became a table format “what if we just put those thoughts next to each other?”).
Lots of it… (and counting)
Totnes (crazy transition town):
Transition network (what they started):
Design thinking (in all its forms):
Trans Europe Halles (big network of Not Quite type self built post-industrial culture centers):
The “Collective Brain” (much smaller Swedish network):
Radical inclusion (military book):
The Ruralization of the World (Research paper):
How buildings learn (TV series):
Mandy Patinkin (Homeland actor with passion):
Responsible in the co-directors group of Not Quites, editor and concept : Marcus Haraldsson
Chair of the board of Not Quite and coordinator : Karl Hallberg
External advisors and contributors: Vera Telemo, Ylva Frid and Henrik Johansson
Mötesplats Steneby: Anders Lindgren
Other co-directors at Not Quite: Malin Palm, Mie Felth, Malin Robertson Harén and Olivia de Jong
The Sustainable Places project through e.g.: Elsa Dahlstrand, Monica Lindstrand and Karin Hedborg
With help from the board, engaged Not Quite members and members of the community of Fengersfors
The report that was produced is a complement to the three existing works:
– “Fengersfors Bruk i Utveckling – teknik- och industrihistoria, produktion och kreativitet , kunskap och utveckling” by Erik Juhlin, Bengt Spade and Bosse Lagerqvist from 2013 which provides a heritage and architectural overview.
– “Förstudie av bruksområde och recipient , Fengersfors-Knarrbyn” by Golder Associates from 2015 which is an
environmental study of the factory and sur rounding areas.
– “FengersforsBruk” by Kerst in Aronsson from 2017 which is the sales prospect of the cur rent owner
Found out that the mill is for sale
The board of Not Quite learnt from the county of Åmål that the Fengersfors mill is for sale. The county declined to buy the mill, and for us at Not quite a long thinking process started. This would fundamentally affect almost all aspects of our work and lives.
Process to discuss possibilities and consequences
Board meetings and discussions, lots of them, but nothing much concrete happened for almost a year.
Ownership workshop with Not Quite members
Architect Ylva Frid led a full day of workshop for Not Quite members about our ownership options and the perspectives of a building.
Ylva told about the different layers of a buildings time-perspectives – and how we now could move from a perspective of months to years, into a perspective of decades or much more. This would inevitably influence our work.
We also drew “heat maps” of how we use the space today, which places we use the most (for what) and what spaces we feel the strongest for (why).
At the end we made a structured brainstorming, and discussed favourable options for future ownership.
Searching for new partners
Applications and networking as widely as possible. Speaking to major stakeholders both private and public. And writing of applications for funding of a more in-depth process.
Application for collaboration with Steneby below:
Collaboration with Steneby
Steneby School of Arts and Craft agreed to assist financially with this period of crucial processing.
Brukets framtid - workshop on the future of the mill - village participation
Henrik Johanssonfrom Fantastic Studios and resilience consultant Vera Telemo led the workshop, using the process described under workshop above, that led to the The New Mill Town report.
The New Mill Town report
Writing, editing, and collecting materials for the report linked above under results.
Talking to more people, networking, and processing the process ahead. And invitation to continued process.
Major stakeholders, Not Quite members, townspeople, and clerks from public institutions invited to workshop about the future ownership of the mill.
Read the full workshop report (in Swedish), written by Vera Telemo, here: Workshop23augusti
Working group meeting - ownership process
Discussing the way forward, and how to realize the best scenario of ownership.
Presentation of the process at TEH meeting in Paris
We presented the “New Mill Town” process, as described above, at the 86th meeting of Trans Europe Halles, http://teh.net/, in Bagneux, Paris (where Not Quite are long time members). Seeking also to secure international interest and input into the process.